Stacy Loeb researcher
Loeb, Stacy
VIAF ID: 308728229 ( Personal )
Permalink: http://viaf.org/viaf/308728229
Preferred Forms
-
100 1 _ ‡a Loeb, Stacy
-
100 0 _ ‡a Stacy Loeb ‡c researcher
4xx's: Alternate Name Forms (2)
Works
Title | Sources |
---|---|
[-2]Proenzyme prostate specific antigen is more accurate than total and free prostate specific antigen in differentiating prostate cancer from benign disease in a prospective prostate cancer screening study |
![]() |
Optimal therapy in localized prostate cancer: an unfolding story. |
![]() |
Outcomes in patients with Gleason score 8-10 prostate cancer: relation to preoperative PSA level |
![]() |
Outcomes of a bladder cancer screening program using home hematuria testing and molecular markers. |
![]() |
Outcomes of radical prostatectomy for patients with clinical stage T1a and T1b disease. |
![]() |
Pathologic findings and clinical outcome of patients undergoing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection after multiple chemotherapy regimens for metastatic testicular germ cell tumors |
![]() |
Pathological outcomes associated with the 17q prostate cancer risk variants. |
![]() |
Patient Perceptions and Shared Decisions About PSA Screening. |
![]() |
Pelvic organ prolapse on YouTube: evaluation of consumer information |
![]() |
Perceived Patient-Provider Communication Quality and Sociodemographic Factors Associated With Watching Health-Related Videos on YouTube: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. |
![]() |
Personalized prostate specific antigen testing using genetic variants may reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies. |
![]() |
Perspectives of Prostate Cancer Patients on Gleason Scores and the New Grade Groups: Initial Qualitative Study. |
![]() |
A prospective study of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for T1 tumors--is transperitoneal, retroperitoneal or hand assisted the best approach? |
![]() |
The Prostate Health Index: a new test for the detection of prostate cancer |
![]() |
Qualitative Twitter analysis of participants, tweet strategies, and tweet content at a major urologic conference |
![]() |
Quantifying downstream impact of inappropriate staging imaging in a cohort of veterans with low- and intermediate-risk incident prostate cancer |
![]() |
Radical retropubic prostatectomy: comparison of the open and robotic approaches for treatment of prostate cancer. |
![]() |
Randomized trials of selenium, vitamin e, or vitamin C for prostate cancer prevention |
![]() |
A rare 8q24 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) predisposes North American men to prostate cancer and possibly more aggressive disease |
![]() |
Re: Editorial Comment on Use of Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors for Erectile Dysfunction and Risk of Malignant Melanoma: D. F. Penson J Urol 2015;194:1710-1711. |
![]() |
Reducing blood loss in open radical retropubic prostatectomy with prophylactic periprostatic sutures. |
![]() |
Regional variation in total cost per radical prostatectomy in the healthcare cost and utilization project nationwide inpatient sample database. |
![]() |
Relationship of prostate-specific antigen velocity to histologic findings in a prostate cancer screening program |
![]() |
Review of the literature: PCA3 for prostate cancer risk assessment and prognostication. |
![]() |
Risk factors, prevention and early detection of prostate cancer |
![]() |
Risk of malignant melanoma in men with prostate cancer: Nationwide, population-based cohort study. |
![]() |
Risk of Prostate Cancer for Young Men With a Prostate Specific Antigen Less Than Their Age Specific Median |
![]() |
The role of high-intensity focused ultrasound in prostate cancer. |
![]() |
The role of prostate cancer biomarkers in undiagnosed men. |
![]() |
Screening for familial and hereditary prostate cancer |
![]() |
Shift from protocol-based to personalized medicine in active surveillance: beginning of a new era. |
![]() |
Should prostate specific antigen be adjusted for body mass index? Data from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging |
![]() |
Significance of preoperative PSA velocity in men with low serum PSA and normal DRE. |
![]() |
Small bowel obstruction and abdominal pain after robotic versus open radical prostatectomy. |
![]() |
Social Media Coverage of Scientific Articles Immediately After Publication Predicts Subsequent Citations - #SoME_Impact Score: Observational Analysis |
![]() |
Social media makes global urology meetings truly global. : The influence of Twitter. |
![]() |
Social media offers unprecedented opportunities for vibrant exchange of professional ideas across continents. |
![]() |
Standard and Targeted Biopsy During Follow-up for Active Surveillance |
![]() |
Survival results in patients with screen-detected prostate cancer versus physician-referred patients treated with radical prostatectomy: early results. |
![]() |
Tertiary Gleason patterns and biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy: proposal for a modified Gleason scoring system. |
![]() |
Testosterone Replacement Therapy and Risk of Favorable and Aggressive Prostate Cancer. |
![]() |
Time to replace prostate-specific antigen (PSA) with the Prostate Health Index (PHI)? Yet more evidence that the PHI consistently outperforms PSA across diverse populations. |
![]() |
"To measure is to know. If you cannot measure it, you cannot improve it": statistical modeling cannot compensate for unmeasured bias. |
![]() |
Treatment of Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer With Abiraterone and Enzalutamide Despite PSA Progression |
![]() |
Treatment outcomes of radical prostatectomy in potential candidates for 3 published active surveillance protocols. |
![]() |
Tumor Characteristics of Carriers and Noncarriers of the deCODE 8q24 Prostate Cancer Susceptibility Alleles |
![]() |
Tweet this: how advocacy for breast and prostate cancers stacks up on social media. |
![]() |
Twitter Activity Associated With U.S. News and World Report Reputation Scores for Urology Departments. |
![]() |
Twitter and academic Urology in the United States and Canada: a comprehensive assessment of the Twitterverse in 2019 |
![]() |
Twitter-based Prostate Cancer Journal Club (#ProstateJC) Promotes Multidisciplinary Global Scientific Discussion and Research Dissemination |
![]() |
Twitter response to the United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations against screening with prostate-specific antigen. |
![]() |
Understanding the Composition of a Successful Tweet in Urology |
![]() |
Undertreatment of Men in Their Seventies with High-risk Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer. |
![]() |
United States trends in active surveillance or watchful waiting across patient socioeconomic status from 2010 to 2015 |
![]() |
Unusual Presentation of a Mullerian Remnant in an Infant with Recurrent Epididymo-orchitis |
![]() |
Update on the Urology Tag Ontology: Standardized Hashtags for Social Media in Urology |
![]() |
Updates in the care and management of prostate cancer: highlights from the 2013 prostate cancer world congress, august 6-10, 2013, melbourne, australia |
![]() |
Upper limit of cancer extent on biopsy defining very low-risk prostate cancer. |
![]() |
Uptake of Active Surveillance for Very-Low-Risk Prostate Cancer in Sweden |
![]() |
The Urology Care Foundation - trusted online resources in an era of misinformation |
![]() |
Use of 2.6 ng/ml prostate specific antigen prompt for biopsy in men older than 60 years |
![]() |
Use of BioGlue in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy |
![]() |
Use of Conservative Management for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer in the Veterans Affairs Integrated Health Care System From 2005-2015 |
![]() |
Use of Empiric Antibiotics in the Setting of an Increased Prostate Specific Antigen |
![]() |
Use of Prostate-Specific Antigen Velocity to Follow Up Patients with Isolated High-Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia on Prostate Biopsy |
![]() |
Use of social media in urology: data from the American Urological Association (AUA). |
![]() |
The use of Twitter to facilitate sharing of clinical expertise in urology. |
![]() |
Using data from an online health community to examine the impact of prostate cancer on sleep |
![]() |
The vanishing prostate cancer phenomenon |
![]() |
What is the prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer? |
![]() |
What is the role of digital rectal examination in men undergoing serial screening of serum PSA levels? |
![]() |
What to do with an abnormal PSA test. |
![]() |
When is a Negative Prostate Biopsy Really Negative? Repeat Biopsies in Detection and Active Surveillance. |
![]() |
Whom to Biopsy: Prediagnostic Risk Stratification with Biomarkers, Nomograms, and Risk Calculators. |
![]() |
Will Changes to Prostate Cancer Screening Guidelines Preserve Benefits and Reduce Harm? |
![]() |
Words of wisdom. Re: Long-term prediction of prostate cancer: prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity is predictive but does not improve the predictive accuracy of a single PSA measurement 15 years or more before cancer diagnosis in a large, represe |
![]() |