COVID-19 vaccination acceptance and hesitancy among healthcare workers in Germany |
|
Developing trustworthy recommendations as part of an urgent response (1-2 weeks): a GRADE concept paper |
|
effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of hepatitis C screening for migrants in the EU/EEA: a systematic review |
|
Efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments for neuroborreliosis - protocol for a systematic revief |
|
Entwicklung von Kriterien für die prospektive Einschätzung des Aktualisierungsbedarfs von Leitlinienempfehlungen: AGIL-Kriterien = Development of criteria for the prospective assessment of the need for updating guideline recommendations: the AGIL criteria |
|
Evaluating agreement between bodies of evidence from randomized controlled trials and cohort studies in medical research: a meta-epidemiological study |
|
Evidence-based guidelines for hypertension and diabetes in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review |
|
Experiencing the risk of overutilising opioids among patients with chronic non-cancer pain in ambulatory care (ERONA): the protocol of an exploratory, randomised controlled trial |
|
Extracorporeal photopheresis versus standard treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children and adolescents |
|
Fate of clinical research studies after ethical approval – follow-up of study protocols until publication |
|
GIN-McMaster guideline tool extension for the integration of quality improvement and quality assurance in guidelines: a description of the methods for its development |
|
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists versus standard androgen suppression therapy for advanced prostate cancer: A systematic review with meta-analysis |
|
Good or best practice statements: proposal for the operationalisation and implementation of GRADE guidance |
|
GRADE equity guidelines 3: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: rating the certainty of synthesized evidence |
|
GRADE evidence to decision (EtD) frameworks for adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of trustworthy recommendations: GRADE-ADOLOPMENT |
|
GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions |
|
Health-related preferences of older patients with multimorbidity: the protocol for an evidence map |
|
Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence |
|
Infection control, prophylactic antibiotics, and testing for SARS-CoV-2 and PPE on German intensive care units: results from a national mixed methods survey |
|
Intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin versus mitomycin C for Ta and T1 bladder cancer: abridged summary of the Cochrane Review |
|
Konzertierte Genexpression durch den Transkriptorfaktor [NF-KappaB]: ein neuer Ansatz der Immuntherapie maligner Tumorerkrankungen |
|
Lack of controlled studies investigating the risk of postpartum haemorrhage in cesarean delivery after prior use of oxytocin: ascoping review |
|
Learning from failure - rationale and design for a study about discontinuation of randomized trials (DISCO study) |
|
Lessons learnt: undertaking rapid reviews on public health and social measures during a global pandemic |
|
L'utilisation de lignes directrices pour l'établissement de rapports en tant qu'intervention éducative pour l'enseignement des méthodes de recherche et la rédaction. |
|
Manual Bewertung des Biasrisikos in Interventionsstudien |
|
Manual Bewertung von systematischen Reviews zu therapeutischen Interventionen |
|
Manual systematische Recherche für Evidenzsynthesen und Leitlinien |
|
Marcos GRADE de la evidencia a la decisión (EtD) : un enfoque sistemático y transparente para tomar decisiones sanitarias bien informadas. 2: Guías de práctica clínica = GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks : a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines |
|
Mental burden and its risk and protective factors during the early phase of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: systematic review and meta-analyses |
|
Methodological quality of guidelines for management of Lyme neuroborreliosis |
|
Mixed method evaluation of the CEBHA+ integrated knowledge translation approach: a protocol |
|
Models of integrated care for multi-morbidity assessed in systematic reviews: a scoping review |
|
Non-dissemination and dissemination Bias in qualitative research: Empirical evidence and conceptualisation |
|
Nonregistration, discontinuation, and nonpublication of randomized trials: a repeated metaresearch analysis |
|
Patients’ self‐reported physical and psychological effects of opioid use in chronic noncancer pain - a retrospective cross‐sectional analysis |
|
Pharmacological interventions for pruritus in adult palliative care patients (review) |
|
Political and public acceptability of a sugar-sweetened beverages tax : a mixed-method systematic review and meta-analysis |
|
Postneoadjuvant surveillance and surgery as needed compared with postneoadjuvant surgery on principle in multimodal treatment for oesophageal cancer: a scoping review protocol |
|
PRECEPT: an evidence assessment framework for infectious disease epidemiology, prevention and control |
|
Predicting hospital admissions from individual patient data (IPD): an applied example to explore key elements driving external validity |
|
prevalence of hearing loss and use of hearing aids among adults in Germany : a systematic review |
|
Prevention and assessment of infectious diseases among children and adult migrants arriving to the European Union/European Economic Association: a protocol for a suite of systematic reviews for public health and health systems |
|
Psychological and psychosocial consequences of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a scoping review |
|
Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study |
|
RARE-Bestpractices: a platform for sharing best practices for the management of rare diseases |
|
Reevaluation of statistically significant meta‐analyses in advanced cancer patients using the Hartung–Knapp method and prediction intervals - a methodological study |
|
Reporting quality of clinical trial protocols: a repeated cross-sectional study about the Adherence to SPIrit Recommendations in Switzerland, CAnada and GErmany (ASPIRE-SCAGE) |
|
Research response to coronavirus disease 2019 needed better coordination and collaboration: a living mapping of registered trials |
|
Results dissemination from completed clinical trials conducted at German university medical centers remained delayed and incomplete. the 2014-2017 cohort |
|
Scientific value of systematic reviews: survey of editors of core clinical journals |
|
Screening strategies for hypertension: a systematic review protocol |
|
Specialist palliative care services for adults with advanced, incurable illness in hospital, hospice or community settings –protocol for a systematic review |
|
Subsequent full publication of qualitative studies presented at United Kingdom Royal College of Nursing Research Conference 2015 and 2016: A follow‐up study |
|
Supporting effective participation in health guideline development groups: The Guideline Participant Tool |
|
Surgical trials and trial registers: a cross-sectional study of randomized controlled trials published in journals requiring trial registration in the author instructions |
|
Systematic review finds that study data not published in full text articles have unclear impact on meta-analyses results in medical research |
|
Systematic reviews should be at the heart of continuing medical education |
|
Tracking the timely dissemination of clinical studies : characteristics and impact of 10 tracking variables |
|
Treatment regimens for immunocompetent elderly patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma: a scoping review |
|
The use of reporting guidelines as an educational intervention for teaching research methods and writing |
|
Use of the GRADE approach in health policymaking and evaluation: a scoping review of nutrition and physical activity policies |
|
Using GRADE Evidence to Decision frameworks to support the process of health policy-making: an example application regarding taxation of sugar-sweetened beverages |
|
Using patient values and preferences to inform the importance of health outcomes in practice guideline development following the GRADE approach |
|
Which actionable statements qualify as good practice statements In Covid-19 guidelines? : a systematic appraisal |
|
Willingness to participate in, support or carry out scientific studies for benefit assessment of available medical interventions: a stakeholder survey |
|
Wissenschaftliche Publikationspraxis in der klinischen Medizin Wissenstransfer als Voraussetzung für evidenzbasierte Medizin |
|
Women’s attitudes towards a human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening strategy: a systematic review |
|
Work-related interventions for preventing back pain - protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
|
worldwide clinical trial research response to the COVID-19 pandemic - the first 100 days [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] |
|