The bench is closer to the bedside than we think: Uncovering the ethical ties between preclinical researchers in translational neuroscience and patients in clinical trials. |
|
Big Data in medical research and EU data protection law: challenges to the consent or anonymise approach. |
|
Cancer patients' intentions towards receiving unsolicited genetic information obtained using next-generation sequencing |
|
Clarifying assent in pediatric research |
|
Consent in psychiatric biobanks for pharmacogenetic research |
|
CRISPR germline engineering--the community speaks |
|
D66 en levensbeschouwing, 2002: |
|
Data sharing in stem cell translational science: policy statement by the International Stem Cell Forum Ethics Working Party |
|
Debate ethics of embryo models from stem cells |
|
Digital Medicine: An Opportunity to Revisit the Role of Bioethicists |
|
[Direct-to-consumer genetic tests in the consulting room] |
|
Disclosure and management of research findings in stem cell research and banking: policy statement. |
|
A duty to recontact in genetics: context matters |
|
Ethical challenges for pediatric liver organoid transplantation |
|
Ethical clinical translation of stem cell interventions for neurologic disease |
|
Ethical considerations for modern molecular pathology |
|
[Ethical dilemmas in a general practitioner's clinic due to incidental findings resulting from whole genome sequencing] |
|
Ethical, legal, and counseling challenges surrounding the return of genetic results in oncology |
|
Ethics at the interface of reproductive medicine and genetic technology : the case of mitochondrial disorders |
|
The ethics of genome editing in non-human animals: a systematic review of reasons reported in the academic literature |
|
Ethics of intergenerational (father-to-son) sperm donation |
|
Ethics of stem cell-derived gametes made in a dish: fertility for everyone? |
|
Ethics parallel research: an approach for (early) ethical guidance of biomedical innovation |
|
Experts’ moral views on gene drive technologies: a qualitative interview study |
|
The FAIR guiding principles for data stewardship: fair enough? |
|
Feedback of individual genetic results to research participants: in favor of a qualified disclosure policy |
|
From deficit to dialogue in science communication: The dialogue communication model requires additional roles from scientists |
|
Geometry of Trust: Why We Need to Distinguish Between Horizontal and Vertical Trust |
|
A Human |
|
Identifiability and privacy in pluripotent stem cell research |
|
Inclusion of residual tissue in biobanks: opt-in or opt-out? |
|
The inherent ethical challenge of first-in-human pluripotent stem cell trials |
|
Investigator initiated research in times of COVID-19: Let's go digital! |
|
Is It Our Duty To Hunt for Pathogenic Mutations? |
|
Learning health care systems: Highly needed but challenging |
|
Mainstreaming informed consent for genomic sequencing: A call for action |
|
Mini-guts in a dish: Perspectives of adult Cystic Fibrosis (CF) patients and parents of young CF patients on organoid technology. |
|
Mitochondrial Replacement Techniques: Remaining Ethical Challenges |
|
Modelling human embryogenesis: embryo-like structures spark ethical and policy debate |
|
Moral Duties of Genomics Researchers: Why Personalized Medicine Requires a Collective Approach |
|
Next Generation DNA Sequencing: Always Allow an Opt Out. |
|
Nieuwe voortplantingstechnologie, nieuwe familievormen, nieuwe ethische vragen? |
|
Organoid biobanking: identifying the ethics: Organoids revive old and raise new ethical challenges for basic research and therapeutic use. |
|
Organoids as hybrids: ethical implications for the exchange of human tissues |
|
Organoids for personalized treatment of Cystic Fibrosis: Professional perspectives on the ethics and governance of organoid biobanking |
|
Participant selection for preventive Regenerative Medicine trials: ethical challenges of selecting individuals at risk |
|
Patients to learn from: on the need for systematic integration of research and care in academic health care |
|
Personalized assent for pediatric biobanks |
|
Placebo in autologous cell-based interventions: hard pill to swallow? |
|
Postmortem disclosure of genetic information to family members: active or passive? |
|
Potential conflicts of interest of editorial board members from five leading spine journals |
|
Preferences for genetic testing for colorectal cancer within a population-based screening program: a discrete choice experiment |
|
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for mitochondrial DNA disorders: ethical guidance for clinical practice |
|
Prognosis for patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: development and validation of a personalised prediction model |
|
Publisher Correction: LifeTime and improving European healthcare through cell-based interceptive medicine |
|
Real-time ethics engagement in biomedical research: Ethics from bench to bedside |
|
Reconsidering the ethics of sham interventions in an era of emerging technologies |
|
Regenerative medicine interventions for orthopedic disorders: ethical issues in the translation into patients |
|
Reply to L. Battistuzzi et Al. |
|
Reply to Waligora |
|
Responsible use of organoids in precision medicine: the need for active participant involvement |
|
The right to an open future concerning genetic information |
|
Scanning the body, sequencing the genome: Dealing with unsolicited findings |
|
Scientific evaluation of spinal implants: an ethical necessity |
|
Scrutinizing Privacy in Multi-Omics Research: How to Provide Ethical Grounding for the Identification of Privacy-Relevant Data Properties |
|
Setting Global Standards for Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation: The 2016 ISSCR Guidelines |
|
Should the 14-day rule for embryo research become the 28-day rule? |
|
The social value of clinical research |
|
Societal impacts of regenerative medicine: reflections on the views of orthopedic professionals |
|
Stem cell trials for cardiovascular medicine: ethical rationale |
|
Studying the lay of the land: views and experiences of professionals in the translational pluripotent stem cell field |
|
Surgical innovation: the ethical agenda: A systematic review |
|
SYMPHONY consortium: Orchestrating personalized treatment for patients with bleeding disorders |
|
Thinking "ethical" when designing an international, cross-disciplinary biomedical research consortium |
|
Toward a "post-posthuman dignity area" in evaluating emerging enhancement technologies. |
|
Unconsented genetic testing in psychiatry: an (almost) no go? |
|
Understanding (in) Consent for Governance |
|
The unique status of first-in-human studies: strengthening the social value requirement |
|
Unsolicited findings of next-generation sequencing for tumor analysis within a Dutch consortium: clinical daily practice reconsidered |
|
User Experiences With and Recommendations for Mobile Health Technology for Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: Mixed Methods Study |
|
What constitutes a reasonable compensation for non-commercial oocyte donors: an analogy with living organ donation and medical research participation |
|
When Children Become Adults: Should Biobanks Re-Contact? |
|
Whole-exome sequencing in pediatrics: parents' considerations toward return of unsolicited findings for their child |
|