Glyn Elwyn Physician-researcher, professor, scientist
Elwyn, Glyn
Elwyn, Glyn, 1955-
VIAF ID: 206301965 (Personal)
Permalink: http://viaf.org/viaf/206301965
Preferred Forms
-
100 1 _ ‡a Elwyn, Glyn
-
-
-
100 1 _ ‡a Elwyn, Glyn
-
100 1 _ ‡a Elwyn, Glyn
-
-
100 1 _ ‡a Elwyn, Glyn ‡d 1955-
-
-
100 0 _ ‡a Glyn Elwyn ‡c Physician-researcher, professor, scientist
4xx's: Alternate Name Forms (11)
Works
Title | Sources |
---|---|
Groups : a guide to small group work in healthcare, management, education and research |
![]() ![]() |
Grupper : att leda små grupper inom hälso- och sjukvård |
![]() |
Has the Two Week Rule Improved Cancer Detection Rates for Gastrointestinal Cancers? A Systematic Literature Review |
![]() |
Healthcare Options for People Experiencing Depression (HOPE*D): the development and pilot testing of an encounter-based decision aid for use in primary care |
![]() |
High workload and job stress are associated with lower practice performance in general practice: an observational study in 239 general practices in the Netherlands |
![]() |
How can clinical practice guidelines be adapted to facilitate shared decision making? A qualitative key-informant study. |
![]() |
How do healthcare professionals working in accountable care organisations understand patient activation and engagement? Qualitative interviews across two time points |
![]() |
How do patients from eastern and western Germany compare with regard to their preferences for shared decision making? |
![]() |
How doctors move from generic goals to specific communicative behavior in real practice consultations. |
![]() |
How healthcare professionals respond to parents with religious objections to vaccination: a qualitative study |
![]() |
How should effectiveness of risk communication to aid patients' decisions be judged? A review of the literature |
![]() |
How to integrate individual patient values and preferences in clinical practice guidelines? A research protocol |
![]() |
Human-Machine Collaboration-A New Form of Paternalism? |
![]() |
Idealistic, impractical, impossible? Shared decision making in the real world |
![]() |
Identifying and prioritizing uncertainties: patient and clinician engagement in the identification of research questions |
![]() |
Identifying future models for delivering genetic services: a nominal group study in primary care |
![]() |
Impact of case management by advanced practice nurses in primary care on unplanned hospital admissions: a controlled intervention study |
![]() |
Implementation of the uterine fibroids Option Grid patient decision aids across five organizational settings: a randomized stepped-wedge study protocol |
![]() |
Implications for Telehealth in a Postpandemic Future: Regulatory and Privacy Issues |
![]() |
Improving calculation, interpretation and communication of familial colorectal cancer risk: protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
![]() |
Improving patient adherence to lifestyle advice |
![]() |
Improving shared decision-making in advanced Parkinson's disease: protocol of a mixed methods feasibility study. |
![]() |
In Absentia: An Exploratory Study of How Patients Are Considered in Multidisciplinary Cancer Team Meetings. |
![]() |
Increasing readiness to decide and strengthening behavioral intentions: evaluating the impact of a web-based patient decision aid for breast cancer treatment options (BresDex: www.bresdex.com). |
![]() |
Influencing referral practice using feedback of adherence to NICE guidelines: a quality improvement report for dyspepsia |
![]() |
Information and decision support needs of parents considering amniocentesis: interviews with pregnant women and health professionals. |
![]() |
Informed consent documentation necessary but not sufficient. |
![]() |
Informed consent documents do not encourage good-quality decision making. |
![]() |
Informed decision making and prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing for prostate cancer: a randomised controlled trial exploring the impact of a brief patient decision aid on men's knowledge, attitudes and intention to be tested. |
![]() |
Informing patients and explaining risks |
![]() |
Inside the black box of shared decision making: distinguishing between the process of involvement and who makes the decision |
![]() |
Insufficient evidence of benefit: a systematic review of home telemonitoring for COPD. |
![]() |
Integrated teams in primary care, 1999: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Interactive patient decision aids for women facing genetic testing for familial breast cancer: a systematic web and literature review |
![]() |
Interprofessionalism and shared decision-making in primary care: a stepwise approach towards a new model |
![]() |
Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals |
![]() |
Interventions to Engage Affective Forecasting in Health-Related Decision Making: A Meta-Analysis. |
![]() |
Interventions to improve risk communication in clinical genetics: systematic review |
![]() |
Interventions to promote informed consent for patients undergoing surgical and other invasive healthcare procedures |
![]() |
Investigation of factors influencing the implementation of two shared decision-making interventions in contraceptive care: a qualitative interview study among clinical and administrative staff |
![]() |
Investing in deliberation: a definition and classification of decision support interventions for people facing difficult health decisions |
![]() |
Involving patients in cardiovascular risk management with nurse-led clinics: a cluster randomized controlled trial |
![]() |
Involving patients in decision making and communicating risk: a longitudinal evaluation of doctors' attitudes and confidence during a randomized trial |
![]() |
Involving patients in primary care consultations: assessing preferences using discrete choice experiments |
![]() |
Is case management effective in reducing the risk of unplanned hospital admissions for older people? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
![]() |
Is general practice in need of a career structure? |
![]() |
Joining them up: the challenges of organisational change in the professional politic of general practice |
![]() |
Judging the 'weight of evidence' in systematic reviews: introducing rigour into the qualitative overview stage by assessing Signal and Noise |
![]() |
Just in time information for clinicians: a questionnaire evaluation of the ATTRACT project |
![]() |
Lost in the global sum? Professional and practice development in primary care after the new general practice contract |
![]() |
Making a decision about trial participation: the feasibility of measuring deliberation during the informed consent process for clinical trials |
![]() |
Making interactive decision support for patients a reality. |
![]() |
Managing expectations of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections: a qualitative study |
![]() |
Manufactured but not imported: new directions for research in shared decision making support and skills |
![]() |
Measuring access to primary care appointments: a review of methods |
![]() |
Measuring general practice-based primary care: generic outcomes. Welsh Primary Care Outcomes Group |
![]() |
Measuring organisational readiness for patient engagement (MORE): an international online Delphi consensus study |
![]() |
Measuring Patient-Reported Shared Decision-Making to Promote Performance Transparency and Value-Based Payment: Assessment of collaboRATE's Group-Level Reliability |
![]() |
Measuring quality through performance. Respecting the subjective: quality measurement from the patient's perspective |
![]() |
Measuring the involvement of patients in shared decision-making: a systematic review of instruments |
![]() |
Measuring triadic decision making in older patients with multiple chronic conditions: Observer OPTIONMCC |
![]() |
Medical Students' Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Shared Decision Making: Results From a Multinational, Cross-Sectional Survey |
![]() |
Methods for incorporating patients' views in health care |
![]() |
Minimal improvement of nurses' motivational interviewing skills in routine diabetes care one year after training: a cluster randomized trial |
![]() |
Minimum standards for the certification of patient decision support interventions: feasibility and application |
![]() |
Patchy 'coherence': using normalization process theory to evaluate a multi-faceted shared decision making implementation program (MAGIC). |
![]() |
A 'real puzzle': the views of patients with epilepsy about the organisation of care |
![]() |
Shared decision-making in health care : achieving evidence-based patient choice |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
A single-blind randomised controlled trial of the effects of a web-based decision aid on self-testing for cholesterol and diabetes. Study protocol |
![]() |