Strech, Daniel
Daniel Strech researcher
Strech, Daniel, 1975-
VIAF ID: 160053618 (Personal)
Permalink: http://viaf.org/viaf/160053618
Preferred Forms
- 100 0 _ ‡a Daniel Strech ‡c researcher
-
-
- 100 1 _ ‡a Strech, Daniel
- 100 1 _ ‡a Strech, Daniel
-
-
- 100 1 _ ‡a Strech, Daniel
-
- 100 1 _ ‡a Strech, Daniel
-
- 100 1 _ ‡a Strech, Daniel ‡d 1975-
-
4xx's: Alternate Name Forms (3)
5xx's: Related Names (4)
- 551 _ _ ‡a Hannover ‡4 ortw ‡4 https://d-nb.info/standards/elementset/gnd#placeOfActivity
- 510 2 _ ‡a Medizinische Hochschule Hannover ‡4 affi ‡4 https://d-nb.info/standards/elementset/gnd#affiliation ‡e Affiliation
- 510 2 _ ‡a Medizinische Hochschule Hannover ‡b Institut für Geschichte, Ethik und Philosophie der Medizin ‡4 affi ‡4 https://d-nb.info/standards/elementset/gnd#affiliation ‡e Affiliation
- 551 _ _ ‡a Stuttgart ‡4 ortg ‡4 https://d-nb.info/standards/elementset/gnd#placeOfBirth
Works
Title | Sources |
---|---|
Analyse und Kritik der medizin-ethischen Diskussion zur Präimplantationsdiagnostik | |
The bench is closer to the bedside than we think: Uncovering the ethical ties between preclinical researchers in translational neuroscience and patients in clinical trials. | |
Benchmarking university medical centres for responsible metrics. A cross sectional study on timely results dissemination across 36 German centres | |
Clinical Ethics in Gabon: The Spectrum of Clinical Ethical Issues Based on Findings from In-Depth Interviews at Three Public Hospitals | |
Current practices for access, compensation, and prioritization in biobanks. Results from an interview study | |
Do Public Involvement Activities in Biomedical Research and Innovation Recruit Representatively? A Systematic Qualitative Review | |
Ethical review of biobank research: Should RECs review each release of material from biobanks operating under an already-approved broad consent and data protection model? | |
Ethics and Governance of Biomedical Research Theory and Practice | |
Ethics Literacy and "Ethics University": Two Intertwined Models for Public Involvement and Empowerment in Bioethics | |
Evidence-based health information from the users' perspective--a qualitative analysis | |
Evidenz und Ethik kritische Analysen zur Evidenz-basierten Medizin und empirischen Ethik | |
Extent and impact of bedside rationing in German hospitals: results of a representative survey among physicians | |
Herausforderungen expliziter Leistungsbegrenzungen durch kostensensible Leitlinien. Ergebnisse einer qualitativen Interviewstudie mit leitenden Klinikärzten | |
How can bedside rationing be justified despite coexisting inefficiency? The need for 'benchmarks of efficiency'. | |
How factual do we want the facts? Criteria for a critical appraisal of empirical research for use in ethics | |
How physicians allocate scarce resources at the bedside: a systematic review of qualitative studies | |
How psychiatry journals support the unbiased translation of clinical research. A cross-sectional study of editorial policies | |
How to evaluate conflict of interest policies | |
The impact of social media on medical professionalism: a systematic qualitative review of challenges and opportunities | |
Implizite Rationierung als Rechtsproblem Ergebnisse einer qualitativen Interviewstudie zur Situation in deutschen Krankenhäusern | |
Improved Evidence Will Support Sound Decision Making but Will Not Solve the Problem of Cost Containment in Oncology | |
Input analysis for two public consultations on the EU Clinical Trials Regulation | |
Institutional dashboards on clinical trial transparency for University Medical Centers: A case study | |
International requirements for consent in biobank research: qualitative review of research guidelines | |
Is there health care rationing in German hospitals? How exactly do we know and why should it not be the most important question? | |
Kommentar I zum Fall: „Der Patientenwille als oberste Instanz – schwierige Umsetzung in der klinischen Forschung“ | |
Das Konzept der Entwicklung von S3-Leitlinien | |
Konzept und Ergebnisse einer Evidenz-basierten Ethik der ärztlichen Rationierung | |
Lack of proportionality. Seven specifications of public interest that override post-approval commercial interests on limited access to clinical data | |
Mitteilungen der DGPPN 4/08 | |
Normative arguments and new solutions for the unbiased registration and publication of clinical trials | |
Offenlegen und dann? Wir brauchen eine rationale Diskussion zu einem angemessenen Umgang mit Interessenkonflikten | |
Participation rate or informed choice? Rethinking the European key performance indicators for mammography screening | |
Participatory improvement of a template for informed consent documents in biobank research - study results and methodological reflections | |
Physician rating sites from an ethical viewpoint: a roadmap | |
Practice variation across consent templates for biobank research. a survey of German biobanks | |
Preclinical efficacy in therapeutic area guidelines from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency: a cross-sectional study | |
Preclinical efficacy studies in investigator brochures: Do they enable risk-benefit assessment? | |
Priority setting and bedside rationing: a discussion of empirical findings | |
Public Awareness and Use of German Physician Ratings Websites: Cross-Sectional Survey of Four North German Cities | |
Public-Health-Ethik | |
The Public's Awareness of and Attitude Toward Research Biobanks - A Regional German Survey. | |
Quality of ethical guidelines and ethical content in clinical guidelines: the example of end-of-life decision-making | |
„Quality of reporting“ in Studien zur bipolaren Störung | |
Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of pharmacologic treatment of bipolar disorders: a systematic review | |
Rationalisierung und Rationierung am Krankenbett | |
Reasons Why Post-Trial Access to Trial Drugs Should, or Need not be Ensured to Research Participants: A Systematic Review | |
Report on the conference "Clinical ethics consultation: theories and methods--implementation--evaluation," February 11-15, 2008, Bochum, Germany. | |
The representation of patient experience and satisfaction in physician rating sites. A criteria-based analysis of English- and German-language sites | |
Research Guideline Recommendations for Broad Consent Forms in Biobank Research and How They Are Currently Addressed in Practice | |
Results dissemination from completed clinical trials conducted at German university medical centers remained delayed and incomplete. the 2014-2017 cohort | |
Results dissemination of registered clinical trials across Polish academic institutions: a cross-sectional analysis | |
Results reporting for clinical trials led by medical universities and university hospitals in the Nordic countries was often missing or delayed | |
Risk assessment in gene therapy and somatic genome-editing: An expert interview study | |
The role of ethics committees and ethics consultation in allocation decisions: a 4-stage process | |
Routinely collected data for randomized trials: promises, barriers, and implications. | |
S3-Leitlinie zur Diagnostik und Therapie bipolarer Störungen | |
The spectrum of ethical issues in a Learning Health Care System: a systematic qualitative review. | |
Systematic and transparent inclusion of ethical issues and recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: a six-step approach | |
Systematic reviews of empirical bioethics | |
A template for broad consent in biobank research. Results and explanation of an evidence and consensus-based development process | |
To overcome failure to publish negative findings: the OPEN project | |
Tracking the timely dissemination of clinical studies : characteristics and impact of 10 tracking variables | |
Value judgments in the analysis and synthesis of evidence | |
Wann ist Krebsfrüherkennung "gute" Medizin? | |
What methods do reviews of normative ethics literature use for search, selection, analysis, and synthesis? In-depth results from a systematic review of reviews | |
When Choosing Wisely meets clinical practice guidelines | |
Which public to involve? More reflection on collective agency and sufficient representativeness is needed. | |
Why are so few patients rating their physicians on German physician rating websites? A qualitative study | |
Why the "appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation" instrument can and should further inform ethics policy work | |
Workshop - Ökonomische Steuerungsmechanismen: Beispiel Hämatologie und Onkologie | |
Would you mind a little bit less? Methodological and ethical challenges posed by the reduction of overtreatment | |
Zuclopenthixol dihydrochloride for schizophrenia | |
Zur Ethik einer restriktiven Regulierung der Studienregistrierung | |
Zur Ethik einer Vorsorge durch (direct-to-consumer) individuelle Genanalysen und Ganzkörper-MRTs. Erläuterung und Diskussion der Empfehlungen des Nuffield Council on Bioethics |