Dowie, Jack.
Jack Dowie
Dowie, Jack (Jack A.)
VIAF ID: 113445875 (Personal)
Permalink: http://viaf.org/viaf/113445875
Preferred Forms
- 100 1 _ ‡a Dowie, Jack
- 100 1 0 ‡a Dowie, Jack
-
-
- 100 1 _ ‡a Dowie, Jack
-
-
- 100 1 _ ‡a Dowie, Jack
-
-
- 100 0 _ ‡a Jack Dowie
4xx's: Alternate Name Forms (2)
Works
Title | Sources |
---|---|
Addressing preference heterogeneity in public health policy by combining Cluster Analysis and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Proof of Method | |
Analysing health outcomes. | |
Bringing Feedback in From the Outback via a Generic and Preference-Sensitive Instrument for Course Quality Assessment. | |
Caveat emptor NICE: biased use of cost-effectiveness is inefficient and inequitable | |
Commentary: The earnest approach to problem betting. | |
The danger of partial evaluation. | |
Decision makers' needs as capacities to benefit | |
Decision technologies and the independent professional: the future's challenge to learning and leadership. | |
Decision validity should determine whether a generic or condition-specific HRQOL measure is used in health care decisions. | |
Developing an Online Decision Aid for Osteoarthritis. | |
Development and preliminary evaluation of a clinical guidance programme for the decision about prophylactic oophorectomy in women undergoing a hysterectomy | |
The development of a multi-criteria decision analysis aid to help with contraceptive choices: My Contraception Tool | |
Enhancing Healthcare Provider Feedback and Personal Health Literacy: Dual Use of a Decision Quality Measure | |
Enhancing informatics competency under uncertainty at the point of decision: a knowing about knowing vision | |
The ethics of parimutuel systems | |
The Evaluation of Decision Support Tools Requires a Measure of Decision Quality That Has Content and Construct Validity in Person-Centred Care | |
'Evidence-based', 'cost-effective' and 'preference-driven' medicine: decision analysis based medical decision making is the pre-requisite | |
From Rapid Recommendation to Online Preference-Sensitive Decision Support: The Case of Severe Aortic Stenosis | |
Health Informatics Can Avoid Committing Symbolic Violence by Recognizing and Supporting Generic Decision-making Competencies | |
Increasing User Involvement in Health Care and Health Research Simultaneously: A Proto-Protocol for "Person-as-Researcher" and Online Decision Support Tools | |
Integrating evidence and individual preferences using a web-based multi-criteria decision analytic tool: an application to prostate cancer screening. | |
Let's open whole process of cost effective modelling. | |
No room for kinkiness in a public healthcare system. | |
The 'number needed to treat' and the 'adjusted NNT' in health care decision-making. | |
Personalised Multi-Criterial Online Decision Support for Siblings Considering Stem Cell Donation: An Interactive Aid. | |
The political economy of the NHS: individualist justifications of collective action | |
The portfolio approach to health behaviour | |
Preferences of Patients With Multiple Sclerosis for Attributes of Disease Modifying Drugs In Decision-Making: A Nominal Group Technique And Best-Worst Scaling | |
Producing informed consumers and users of decision analysis | |
Professional judgment : a reader in clinical decision making | |
Research implications of science-informed, value-based decision making. | |
The research-practice gap and the role of decision analysis in closing it. | |
Risk and chance, 1980 | |
The role of patients' meta-preferences in the design and evaluation of decision support systems. | |
The Role of Personalised Choice in Decision Support: A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Online Decision Aid for Prostate Cancer Screening | |
Standardization of Growth Hormone Measurement, Evidence-Based Medicine. Proceedings of the 3rd KIGS/KIMS Expert Meeting on Growth and Growth Disorders. Sorrento, Italy, November 19-20, 1998 | |
Towards generic online multicriteria decision support in patient-centred health care | |
Towards Integrating the Principlist and Casuist Approaches to Ethical Decisions via Multi-Criterial Support | |
What decision analysis can offer the clinical decision maker. Why outcome databases such as KIGS and KIMS are vital sources for decision analysis | |
Who should decide how much and what information is important in person-centred health care? | |
Why cost-effectiveness should trump (clinical) effectiveness: the ethical economics of the South West quadrant | |
Women's views of two interventions designed to assist in the prophylactic oophorectomy decision: a qualitative pilot evaluation |