Lutz Bornmann
Bornmann, Lutz 1967-
Bornmann, Lutz
VIAF ID: 45207790 (Personal)
Permalink: http://viaf.org/viaf/45207790
Preferred Forms
-
- 100 1 _ ‡a Bornmann, Lutz
- 100 1 _ ‡a Bornmann, Lutz ‡d 1967-
- 100 1 _ ‡a Bornmann, Lutz ‡d 1967-
- 100 1 _ ‡a Bornmann, Lutz ‡d 1967-
- 100 0 _ ‡a Lutz Bornmann
4xx's: Alternate Name Forms (3)
5xx's: Related Names (4)
- 551 _ _ ‡a Hann. Münden ‡4 ortg ‡4 https://d-nb.info/standards/elementset/gnd#placeOfBirth
- 551 _ _ ‡a Kassel ‡4 ortw ‡4 https://d-nb.info/standards/elementset/gnd#placeOfActivity
- 510 2 _ ‡a Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften ‡b Generalverwaltung ‡4 affi ‡4 https://d-nb.info/standards/elementset/gnd#affiliation ‡e Affiliation
- 551 _ _ ‡a Zürich ‡4 ortw ‡4 https://d-nb.info/standards/elementset/gnd#placeOfActivity
Works
Title | Sources |
---|---|
Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors: An alternative research design with policy implications | |
The interest of the scientific community in expert opinions from journal peer review procedures | |
Is the promotion of research reflected in bibliometric data? A network analysis of highly cited papers on the Clusters of Excellence supported under the Excellence Initiative in Germany | |
The journal Impact Factor and alternative metrics: A variety of bibliometric measures has been developed to supplant the Impact Factor to better assess the impact of individual research papers | |
The Journal Impact Factor Should Not Be Discarded | |
Journal peer review as an information retrieval process | |
Karriere mit Doktortitel?, c2001: | |
Macro-indicators of citation impacts of six prolific countries: InCites data and the statistical significance of trends | |
Mapping excellence in the geography of science: An approach based on Scopus data | |
Mapping the impact of papers on various status groups in excellencemapping.net: a new release of the excellence mapping tool based on citation and reader scores | |
Measuring impact in research evaluations: a thorough discussion of methods for, effects of and problems with impact measurements | |
Measuring Individual Performance with Comprehensive Bibliometric Reports as an Alternative to h-Index Values. | |
Measuring the societal impact of research: research is less and less assessed on scientific impact alone--we should aim to quantify the increasingly important contributions of science to society | |
Methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics: Which method best reflects the judgements of experts? | |
A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants | |
Multiple publication on a single research study: Does it pay? The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine | |
The negative effects of citing with a national orientation in terms of recognition: national and international citations in papers from Germany, the Netherlands, and UK | |
Networks of reader and country status: an analysis of Mendeley reader statistics | |
A new family of cumulative indexes for measuring scientific performance | |
Normalization of Mendeley reader impact on the reader- and paper-side: A comparison of the mean discipline normalized reader score (MDNRS) with the mean normalized reader score (MNRS) and bare reader counts | |
The number of linked references of publications in Microsoft Academic in comparison with the Web of Science | |
On the meaningful and non-meaningful use of reference sets in bibliometrics | |
Overlay maps based on Mendeley data: The use of altmetrics for readership networks | |
Panel peer review of grant applications: what do we know from research in social psychology on judgment and decision-making in groups? | |
Percentile ranks and the integrated impact indicator (I3) | |
A persistent problem. Traditional gender roles hold back female scientists | |
Plots for visualizing paper impact and journal impact of single researchers in a single graph. | |
Policy documents as sources for measuring societal impact: how often is climate change research mentioned in policy-related documents? | |
Potential sources of bias in research fellowship assessments: effects of university prestige and field of study | |
Productivity does not equal usefulness | |
Professional and citizen bibliometrics: complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators-a state-of-the-art report | |
Proposal of a minimum constraint for indicators based on means or averages | |
Qualitätssicherung an Hochschulen Empfehlungen zur Durchführung mehrstufiger Evaluationsverfahren in Studium und Lehre | |
Quality assurance in higher education – meta-evaluation of multi-stage evaluation procedures in Germany | |
Recent Developments in China–U.S. Cooperation in Science | |
Reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS) of Eugene Garfield's publications. | |
Referenced Publication Years Spectroscopy applied to iMetrics: Scientometrics, Journal of Informetrics, and a relevant subset of JASIST | |
The Relative Influences of Government Funding and International Collaboration on Citation Impact | |
A reliability-generalization study of journal peer reviews: a multilevel meta-analysis of inter-rater reliability and its determinants | |
The research guarantors of scientific papers and the output counting: a promising new approach | |
Response to Stephen Holgate | |
The Role of Climate in the Collapse of the Maya Civilization: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Discourse | |
Row-column (RC) association model applied to grant peer review | |
Scientometrics in a changing research landscape: bibliometrics has become an integral part of research quality evaluation and has been changing the practice of research | |
Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review - A citation analysis of publications previously published to approval or rejection of post-doctoral research fellowship applicants | |
Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisions | |
Sequence analysis of annually normalized citation counts: an empirical analysis based on the characteristic scores and scales (CSS) method | |
Skewness of citation impact data and covariates of citation distributions: A large-scale empirical analysis based on Web of Science data | |
Slow reception and under-citedness in climate change research: A case study of Charles David Keeling, discoverer of the risk of global warming. | |
Social origin and gender of doctoral degree holders | |
The Social Systems Citation Theory (SSCT): A proposal to use the social systems theory for conceptualizing publications and their citations links | |
Some interesting insights from aggregated data published in the World Report SIR 2010 | |
The state of h index research. Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance? | |
Statistical tests and research assessments: A comment on Schneider (2012) | |
Stiftungspropheten in der Wissenschaft eine wissenschaftssoziologische Studie über die Reliabilität, Fairness und Validität des Peer-Review-Verfahrens für ein Postgraduierten-Stipendien-Programm | |
Testing differences statistically with the Leiden ranking | |
To what extent does the Leiden manifesto also apply to altmetrics? A discussion of the manifesto against the background of research into altmetrics | |
Topical connections between the institutions within an organisation (institutional co-authorships, direct citation links and co-citations) | |
Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents | |
The use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data: Opportunities and limits | |
Usefulness of altmetrics for measuring the broader impact of research | |
The usefulness of peer review for selecting manuscripts for publication: a utility analysis taking as an example a high-impact journal | |
The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: A comparative study using data from InCites and F1000 | |
Validity of altmetrics data for measuring societal impact: A study using data from Altmetric and F1000Prime | |
Visualizing the context of citations referencing papers published by Eugene Garfield: a new type of keyword co-occurrence analysis. | |
What are the top five journals in economics? A new meta-ranking | |
What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior | |
What do we know about theh index? | |
What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? a literature survey | |
What is the effect of country-specific characteristics on the research performance of scientific institutions? Using multi-level statistical models to rank and map universities and research-focused institutions worldwide | |
What proportion of excellent papers makes an institution one of the best worldwide? Specifying thresholds for the interpretation of the results of the SCImago Institutions Ranking and the Leiden Ranking | |
Which Are the “Best” Cities for Psychology Research Worldwide? | |
Which are the best performing regions in information science in terms of highly cited papers? Some improvements of our previous mapping approaches | |
Which aspects of the Open Science agenda are most relevant to scientometric research and publishing? An opinion paper | |
Which cities produce more excellent papers than can be expected? A new mapping approach, using Google Maps, based on statistical significance testing | |
Which differences can be expected when two universities in the Leiden Ranking are compared? Some benchmarks for institutional research evaluations | |
Which early works are cited most frequently in climate change research literature? A bibliometric approach based on Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy. | |
Which of the world's institutions employ the most highly cited researchers? An analysis of the data from highlycited.com | |
Which people use which scientific papers? An evaluation of data from F1000 and Mendeley | |
Which percentile-based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values? An empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed citation-rank approach (P100) | |
সংশোধন |