Murphy, M. Maureen
VIAF ID: 258163986 ( Personal )
Permalink: http://viaf.org/viaf/258163986
Preferred Forms
- 100 1 _ ‡a Murphy, M. Maureen
- 100 1 _ ‡a Murphy, M. Maureen
- 100 1 0 ‡a Murphy, M. Maureen
4xx's: Alternate Name Forms (1)
Works
Title | Sources |
---|---|
1996年1月の日本の首相交代 | |
Appeals court clears most roadblocks to credit union expansion regulations | |
Banking regulatory relief legislation. | |
Banks, securities and the Volcker rule : background and issues | |
Bureau of Indian Affairs' new take on taking land into trust for Indians | |
Carcieri v. Salazar : the Secretary of the Interior may not acquire trust land for the Narragansett Indian Tribe under 25 U.S.C. section 465 because that statute applies to tribes "under federal jurisdiction" in 1934 | |
Court battle for Fintech bank charters to continue | |
District Court rejects Department of the Interior's ban on tribes' re-petitioning for federal recognition | |
Executive order 13438 : blocking property of certain persons who threaten stabilization efforts in Iraq | |
Financial privacy laws affecting sharing of customer information among affiliated institutions | |
Financial services and cybersecurity : the federal role | |
The Glass-Steagall Act : a legal and policy analysis | |
High court to review tribal police search and seizure case | |
Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) : gaming on newly acquired lands | |
Japan's January 1996 leadership change. | |
Mashpee Wampanoag v. Bernhardt : a tale of two definitions of "Indian" | |
North Dakota merchants sue Fed, claiming debit card swipe fees exceed those allowed by the Durbin Amendment to the Electronic Funds Transfer Act | |
Second Circuit dismisses New York State challenge to Office of Comptroller of the Currency's fintech charter authority | |
Second circuit rules on the legal framework for cigarette sales between Indian Reservations | |
Senkyūhyaku kujūrokunen ichigatsu no nihon no shushō kōtai | |
Small investors, stocks, and financial intermediaries, 1998: | |
Supreme Court takes Indian treaty right-to-travel case | |
Update: extent of habitat protection required for Indian treaty fishing sites : Washington v. United States |